WaPo: We studied thousands of anonymous posts about the Parkland attack — and found a conspiracy in the making.

I was able to read this on iPad; hopefully this link will get you to readable text.

There was some discussion on Twitter last night about how we (of the earlier blogging gen) should have shut down extremism, instead of perceiving 'all opinions' as a First Amendment issue. In being magnanimous and patting ourselves on the back, we allowed Pandora's Box to flap open. I faced attacks over this issue in 2000; as I've mentioned before, I find it ironic that my former accusers now moderate their own feeds - or have dropped comments entirely. A certain segment of the warblogger generation opened their comment areas to any and all, creating small self-justifying black holes of discontent; the defining feature of that group was to turn aside from our previous generation, use the tech and culture we had created, and set up their own systems of achievement. We, the originators, became invisible in a short couple of years around the time of the second Iraq War, and some journalists still look back to that warblogger group as the 'original' webloggers. We lost influence - became nearly irrelevant - through having our own rug pulled out from under us. We enabled the tech for utopian goals; we forgot human nature.

Slate: Mueller’s Russia indictment is full of bad English.

So scold on, pedants: It’s not just good again to pay attention to sentence fragments and dangling participles—it’s patriotic.

It's so funny ... if I see poor grammar or spelling, I just move on and never link. If the person can't spell or construct a sentence, my conclusion is that they're not a person to take an opinion from.

Slate: It’s time to show the carnage of mass shootings.

This will be touchy. I don't expect agreement with my views. I grew up in the '60's, and I used to actively avoid the evening news. Once we got a color television, that is. All the reports from Vietnam - Jesus, they were traumatic. My child's mind remembers two things very distinctly: the green of the jungle contrasted with the gallons of red clotting blood. Every. Night. Over the years, it had a significant deterrent effect. Even the most hardened conservative veterans questioned the goals of the war by 1969 (in my hearing, anyway).

But today, we live on the other side of the 'minicam' revolution of the '70's, when earnest video crews would go out with their 60 pound reel-to-reel rigs and film the latest murders and car accidents in full Technicolor. Even more, now, today, we're soaked in the blood and gore of video games, wholesome families watching crime procedurals while eating dinner (frequently featuring gooey corpse dissections) ...

Would viewing any of yesterday's carnage have an effect on public opinion? I have a very sad suspicion it would not. I fear most that some will find it entertaining and enjoyable. Likewise surveillance footage; some would enjoy critiquing his strategy, and want to improve upon it.

So while I appreciate the idea and the goal of showing the carnage, the world is a different place nowadays. I don't think this would be the most effective method of changing people's minds and getting Congress off their fat butts.

Which brings me around to a bit of tangential trivia, since I mentioned Vietnam. Have you ever seen the memorial to Thích Quảng Đức, the Buddhist priest who immolated himself in a Saigon intersection? He generated more opposition to the war - worldwide - than anyone else, even though his opposition was to religious persecution. It is a beautiful and fitting piece of sculpture. I honor his sacrifice, as I will honor those who will involuntarily be sacrificed before America wakes up and climbs to higher moral ground.

Because you know there will be more. There is no tipping point for Republicans today; if they can rationalize Trump, they can rationalize mass murder. We have to take this on at the local level, starting at the schools and school boards, and work up. We get the culture we allow.

17 dead in Florida.

Seventeen. High schoolers, bundles of potential.

I have to make the observation that this is really odd timing. Allegedly a Remington AR-15 was used, and the calls for gun control are starting again ... just a few days after Remington declares they need to go bankrupt. I don't buy into conspiracies, but the thought that a gun manufacturer might get thrown a 'Hail Mary' pass because of young lives lost, makes me physically ill.

Later: Jesus Christ. Vox is trotting out the 'Australian disarmament' story for the umpteen-thousandth time. Others are hauling out the same old archival sermons. I still say (I proposed this after the club shooting in Orlando) every LGBT person in America should join the NRA. Nine million of you. NRA's current membership is at ~6 million. "Gays with Guns" had a ring to it. Given that high schoolers were targeted this time, Millennials, this is your moment. Ninety-two MILLION of you. Overrun the damned place, grab the jackass by the reins, and drag it into the 21st Century. It's your chance. Make that change. There is no individual right anyway. The 2nd Amendment was all about the militias ... those thrice-damned, useless militias (ask George Washington!).

The Art of Manliness: Why Do We Follow the News?

The real question then is not whether or not to consume the news, but how much, and from where. The aim is conscious intention rather than complete abstention.

Timely. Conscious intention. I like that. Also - measureable effects. As with RSS feeds - if it wastes your time, or doesn't bring benefits, dump it. Simple. Some feel that dropping the NY Times is akin to murder; I don't find it so. I find the cycling of fresh perspectives enlivening. YMMV.

NY Times: Publicly, We Say #MeToo. Privately, We Have Misgivings.

Again, we men need to stand aside and let women find their own equilibrium (unless grave injustice is being contemplated).

Men will eventually be invited back into the conversation. And if you haven't been listening, well ... I hope you're ready for the reaction. Because there are hundreds of years of pain behind much of this.